Education, media, and the transformation of social and cultural structures

Article

Education, media, and the transformation of social and cultural structures

Received 23.06.2025, Revised 29.10.2025, Accepted 17.12.2025

https://doi.org/10.67524/verus4/1.2025.16

Retrieved from Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025

Pages 16-27

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how digital educational platforms transform the social and cultural practices of young people and influence the formation of new mechanisms of social mobility. The research encompassed three countries with distinct educational and cultural traditions: South Korea, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The methodology was grounded in a stepwise analysis of official documents and statistical data, corporate reports, and academic studies, as well as a comparative assessment of the key parameters of digital platforms, including value orientations, mobility mechanisms, and cultural educational practices. The analysis demonstrated that the national Korean platform of massive open online courses operated as an institutionalised channel for converting young people’s academic achievements into symbolic and educational capital, while simultaneously supporting collective forms of online learning and group identity. In the United States, an examination of the Coursera platform and the educational segment of YouTube indicated the predominance of personalised learning trajectories, a focus among young people on career mobility, and the entrepreneurial use of knowledge, particularly through certification programmes and practices of creating and monetising educational content. The analysis of these cases made it possible to delineate specific models of media education that developed around each platform and shaped the modes through which young people accumulated cultural capital. At the same time, YouTube emerged as an environment that fosters an attention economy, where educational channels with audiences in the millions became a source of both knowledge and income for content creators. In the United Kingdom, the principal focus was placed on the BBC Bitesize platform, which during the pandemic reached at least six million users per week and became an important instrument for equalising opportunities in examination preparation for pupils from low-income families. The practical significance of the study lies in its potential application to the development of educational strategies that take cultural specificities into account and enhance social mobility and equality of access to knowledge in the digital age


References
  1. 3Blue1Brown. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/c/3blue1brown.
  2. Academic Credit Bank System. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cb.or.kr/creditbank/info/nInfo7_1.do.
  3. Afrilyasanti, R., Basthomi, Y., Laily Zen, E., & Fauziah, H. (2023). Addressing information overload in smart environment: Framework for critical media literacy integration in EFL context. Educational Media International, 60(1), 31-47. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2023.2183572.
  4. Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), article number 88. doi: 10.3390/educsci13010088.
  5. Allmann, K. (2022). UK Digital Poverty Evidence Review 2022. Ascot: Digital Poverty Alliance.
  6. Alomari, M.A., Alqudah, R.A., Al Rub, M.A., Alqsaireen, E.M., & Khasawneh, M.A.S. (2023). The role of media in educational social construction of children with special needs. Information Sciences Letters, 12(7), 2933-2940. doi: 10.18576/isl/120720.
  7. BBC Bitesize school tour. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.dentsu.com/uk/en/bbc-bitesize-school-tour.
  8. BBC Bitesize. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize.
  9. Bello-Bravo, J., Payumo, J., & Pittendrigh, B. (2021). Measuring the impact and reach of informal educational videos on YouTube: The case of scientific animations without borders. Heliyon, 7(12). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08508.
  10. Brunetti, F., Matt, D.T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 697-724. doi: 10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309.
  11. Cagatin, C.S. (2024). The societal transformation: The role of social networking platforms in shaping the digital age. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 3(3), 103-107. doi: 10.55324/iss.v3i3.648.
  12. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-children/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2023.
  13. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/children/children-media-use-and-attitudes-2024/childrens-media-literacy-report-2024.pdf?v=368229&.
  14. Coleman, V. (2021). Digital divide in UK education during COVID-19 pandemic: Literature review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Assessment. doi: 10.17863/CAM.110826.
  15. Content Brief BBC. (2022). Health and well-being (age 8-11). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/teach/class-clips-video/articles/zh86g2p.
  16. Coursera. (2021). Coursera impact report 2021: Serving the world through learning. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about/press/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-Coursera-Impact-Report.pdf.
  17. Coursera. (2023). Learner outcomes report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about/press/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Learner-Outcomes-Report-2023.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
  18. Coursera. (2024). 2024 impact report: Transforming lives through learning. Retrieved from https://s27.q4cdn.com/928340662/files/doc_downloads/2025/03/2024-Impact-Report_Coursera.pdf.
  19. Coursera. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/.
  20. CrashCourse. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/user/crashcourse.
  21. Davies, M.M. (2025). “Is it any good? Why does it matter?” Issues of quality and value in children’s television. Journal of British Cinema and Television, 22(2), 212-233. doi: 10.3366/jbctv.2025.0764.
  22. Davies, M.M. (2022). Bitesizes, battlegrounds and bedtimes: Children at the BBC. Critical Studies in Television, 17(2), 170-177. doi: 10.1177/17496020211067387.
  23. Discord. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://discord.com.
  24. Edutubers. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/edutubers.
  25. Exploring YouTube’s impact in the U.S. in 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/youtubes-impact/#30.
  26. Farooq, K., Bashir, S., Zafar, H., Zarar, R., & Sadiq, W. (2021). The study on the role of social media in social change in society. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(2), 1298-1313.
  27. Fidan, M., Debbağ, M., & Fidan, B. (2021). Adolescents like Instagram! From secret dangers to an educational model by its use motives and features: An analysis of their mind maps. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 501-531. doi: 10.1177/0047239520985176.
  28. FutureLearn. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/.
  29. Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), article number 746. doi: 10.3390/educsci13070746.
  30. Gomez, D.C. (2021). The third digital divide and Bourdieu: Bidirectional conversion of economic, cultural, and social capital to (and from) digital capital among young people in Madrid. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2534-2553. doi: 10.1177/1461444820933252.
  31. Gosain, P., & Yadav, K. (2020). A study on social media usage and fear of missing out (FOMO) among youngsters. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 76-87.
  32. Government Policies and Goals. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://english.moe.go.kr/sub/infoRenewal.do?m=0401&page=0401&s=english.
  33. Haşiloğlu, M.A., Çalhan, H.S., & Ustaoğlu, M.E. (2020). Determining the views of the secondary school science teachers about the use of social media in education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 346-354. doi: 10.1007/s10956-020-09820-0.
  34. Hodkinson, P. (2024). Media, culture and society: An introduction (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  35. Kakao. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.kakaocorp.com/page/.
  36. Kandpal, A.S., Tripathi, G., Gupta, V., Rawat, S., & Tripathi, S. (2023). A study on perception of students towards use of social media in education. International Journal of Advanced Mass Communication and Journalism, 4(1), 1-3.
  37. K-MOOC. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.kmooc.kr/.
  38. Kotilainen, S., Okkonen, J., Vuorio, J., & Leisti, K. (2020). Youth media education in the age of algorithm-driven social media. In D. Frau-Meigs, S. Kotilainen, M. Pathak-Shelat, M. Hoechsmann & S.R. Poyntz (Eds.), The handbook of media education research (pp. 131-139). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119166900.ch10.
  39. Lee, H., & Lee, R. (2024). Transformation of Korean higher education in the digital era: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(2), 47-55. doi: 10.32674/jcihe.v16i2.5847.
  40. Lee, J., Song, H.-D., & Kim, Y. (2023). Quality factors that influence the continuance intention to use MOOCs. European Journal of Psychology Open, 82(3), 109-119. doi: 10.1024/2673-8627/a000047.
  41. Lee, T.-H. (2024). From lecture halls to online portals: The rise of K-MOOC in Korea. Retrieved from https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2024-06-26/national/kcampus/From-lecture-halls-to-online-portals-The-rise-of-KMOOC-in-Korea/2076209.
  42. Lobo-Quintero, R., Hernández-Leo, D., Taibi, D., Theophilou, E., & Sánchez-Reina, R. (2025). Analysing factors influencing student engagement in an educative social media platform. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(11), 2697-2712. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2406259.
  43. Mazzucato, M., Conway, R., Mazzoli, E.M., Knoll, E., & Albala, S. (2020). Creating and measuring dynamic public value at the BBC. In Policy report (IIPP WP 2020-23). London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
  44. MOOC LIST. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.mooc-list.com/tags/korean.
  45. Mooy, A.S., Marpaung, T., & Hambandima, E.S.N. (2025). The influence of Tiktok as a learning media to develop youngsters’ English proficiency. Journal of Language, Education, Literature, and Culture, 3(1). doi: 10.33323/l.v3i1.61.
  46. NILE. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nile.or.kr/index.do?lang=en.
  47. Nominet. (2023). Digital youth index 2023. Retrieved from https://digitalyouthindex.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Digital-Youth-Index-2023-report.pdf.
  48. Novella, R., Rosas-Shady, D., & Freund, R. (2024). Is online job training for all? Experimental evidence on the effects of a Coursera program in Costa Rica. Journal of Development Economics, 169, article number 103285. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103285.
  49. Oak National Academy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.thenational.academy/.
  50. OECD. (2021). OECD skills strategy implementation guidance for Korea: Strengthening the governance of adult learning. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/f19a4560-en.
  51. OpenLearn. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.open.edu/openlearn/.
  52. Park, T.J., Whang, J., Watts, S., & Han, D.-G. (2022). Key success factors in the continuous use of MOOC education in South Korea. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 31(2), 137-165. doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2022.120665.
  53. Pasquel-López, C., Rodríguez-Aceves, L., & Valerio-Ureña, G. (2022). Social network analysis of EduTubers. Frontiers in Education, 7, article number 845647. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.845647.
  54. Patreon. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.patreon.com/.
  55. Pereira, S., & Moura, P. (2022). Assessing media literacy competences: Reflections and recommendations from a quantitative study. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 14(3), 79-93. doi: 10.23860/JMLE-2022-14-3-7.
  56. Raheem, A., Khan, S.G., Ahmed, M., Alvi, F.J., Saleem, K., & Batool, S. (2023). Impact of excessive screen time on speech & language in children. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, 22(3), 155-159. doi: 10.22442/jlumhs.2023.01020.
  57. Results of the selection of Korean open online courses announced. (2018). Retrieved from https://english.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=265&boardSeq=74653&lev=0&m=0301&opType=N&page=1&s=english&searchType=SC&statusYN=C&.
  58. Santa María, L., Aliagas, C., & Rutten, K. (2022). Youth’s literary socialisation practices online: A systematic review of research. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 34, article number 100628. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100628.
  59. Seneca. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://senecalearning.com/en-GB/.
  60. TES. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/.
  61. Theophilou, E., Lobo-Quintero, R., Hernández-Leo, D., Sánchez-Reina, R., & Ognibene, D. (2024). Embedding educational narrative scripts in a social media environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1780-1793. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2024.3409063.
  62. TikTok. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.tiktok.com.
  63. Van Lieshout, K. (2020). United Kingdom: BBC Bitesize. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  64. YouTube. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/.
  65. Zembylas, M. (2019). Emotional capital and education: Theoretical insights from Bourdieu. In D. Reay (Ed.), Bourdieu and education (pp. 41-61). London: Routledge.
  66. Zhang, G., Kim, D.-W., Qi, J., & Zhao, C. (2022). What factors influence MOOC course completion? An investigation of course completion and workplace benefits from interpersonal attraction theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 1055108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1055108.
  67. Zhou, Y., & Deng, L. (2023). A systematic review of media multitasking in educational contexts: Trends, gaps, and antecedents. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6279-6294. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2032760.
  68. Zou, W., Hu, X., Pan, Z., Li, C., Cai, Y., & Liu, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between social presence and learners’ prestige in MOOC discussion forums using automated content analysis and social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, article number 106582. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106582.

Suggested citation
Kamenov, H. (2025). Education, media, and the transformation of social and cultural structures. Journal of Media & Social Change, 1(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.67524/verus4/1.2025.16